Final answer:
Traditional natural law theorists believe in inherent moral laws within nature's order, as intended by a divine creator, which are discoverable through reason. However, critics question the objectivity and the premise of fixed human nature due to varying interpretations and environmental influences on behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
Traditional natural law theorists like Thomas Aquinas conclude that there are immutable moral laws embedded in the natural order of the world, as designed by God. According to this view, these laws are discernable and understood through human reason. The natural law dictates that certain behaviors are inherently right or wrong, independent of human opinions or legislation. Aquinas posits that human laws must be in alignment with natural law to be valid; otherwise, they are just perv_ersions of law.
Critics of natural law theory, however, point out the variability in human interpretations of nature and question the ability to objectively determine the inherent moral qualities of human nature. Some argue that human behaviors are more a product of environmental factors than a fixed natural order. They contend that moral principles cannot be directly inferred from biological facts or the nature of Homo sapiens due to the influential role of environment and societal factors on human behavior.