Final answer:
The probability of a randomly generated individual having an identical DNA profile to Sollecito is extremely low. DNA profiling can conclusively link a suspect to biological evidence from a crime scene. Similar size in fruits, such as kiwi and strawberry, does not imply the same amount of DNA due to species-specific genetic variations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The probability of a randomly generated individual having the same DNA profile as a specific person, such as Sollecito, is extraordinarily low due to the uniqueness of the DNA sequence of each individual. In the context of forensics, DNA profiling is used to match a suspect to evidence found at a crime scene. The matching is based on comparing specific regions of the DNA that are known to vary greatly among individuals. To match an individual to a DNA sample, the sample from the crime scene (blood, skin cells, etc.) must exactly match the DNA of the suspect. This exact match is what can establish a relationship for paternity or link a suspect to a crime.
Comparing two fruits like a kiwi and strawberry, regardless of their size, may not yield the same amount of DNA because different species have varying amounts of DNA due to their different genetic makeup and chromosome count. Therefore, a similar size does not guarantee a similar DNA quantity.