Final answer:
Monies gained from selling oil should be invested in public services and infrastructure rather than Civil wars, aligning with the 'guns versus butter' debate, and focusing on the nation's social and economic development.
Step-by-step explanation:
The monies gained from selling oil, rather than being spent on Civil wars, could be better allocated towards endeavors that promote the well-being and advancement of a nation's citizens. This echoes the guns versus butter debate, emphasizing the need for the government to make critical choices between military spending and social welfare programs. Historically, during the American Civil War, both Confederate and Union leaders had to decide on various financial strategies such as taxing, borrowing, printing money, and selling bonds to fund the war effort, with each method having its economic implications. The revenue could be used to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and other critical areas that contribute to economic growth and improve the quality of life for citizens. This investment in the nation's future would be a stark contrast to the expenditure on conflict, where often those who suffer most from the war gain the least, as was the case with many southern soldiers during the Civil War.