Final answer:
False. The distinction between ordinary and extraordinary treatment is morally relevant because it involves determining what is considered the standard and expected level of care, versus what is considered above and beyond that standard.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary treatment is morally irrelevant. The answer to this question is False. The distinction between ordinary and extraordinary treatment is morally relevant because it involves determining what is considered the standard and expected level of care, versus what is considered above and beyond that standard. Ordinary treatment refers to the standard care that a patient would normally receive, while extraordinary treatment refers to medical interventions that go beyond what is typically expected or required.