Final answer:
It is true that theories and techniques are based on lived experiences and research supporting gender and other inequities. Critical race and gender theory, intersectionality, and feminist theories all draw upon the experiences of the oppressed to provide a richer understanding of epistemological insights and the systemic nature of inequalities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that theories and techniques are based on lived experiences and research supporting gender and other inequities is indeed true. Theories like critical race and gender theory and intersectionality draw from the lived experiences of individuals and groups, acknowledging the unique and often marginalized perspectives that can arise from such experiences.
These theories recognize that an understanding of oppressors and the oppressed contributes to a richer epistemology, with a clear view that those who are marginalized often have clearer and surer knowledge than those from the dominant groups due to the need to navigate and resist various forms of oppression.
Feminist sociologist Patricia Hill Collins developed intersection theory, which suggests that we cannot separate the effects of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and other attributes. This theory highlights that multiple layers of disadvantage intersect to create complex experiences of race and prejudice.
In addition, critical gender theory points out the particular vulnerabilities faced by individuals who exist at the intersection of multiple marginalized identities, such as Black and Hispanic women, who experience a compounded form of oppression due to their race and gender simultaneously.
Furthermore, feminist theories aim to understand and address the deep-seated roots of gender inequality that are systemic within education and other societal institutions. Through examining these multi-faceted levels of inequality, these theories contribute to a more thorough understanding of the social mechanisms that perpetuate inequity.