4.9k views
3 votes
A colleague of Mr Modise has questioned why the background information on the study refers to ‘uncertainty’; however, no consideration was given to ‘uncertainty’ in the statements of hypotheses. Thus, to achieve the aim of the study, he has recommended that an additional hypothesis should be framed around management sensemaking of uncertainty and business performance

User Andy Wan
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Scientists sometimes overlook or discount unexpected findings that challenge assumptions. The colleague suggests framing an additional hypothesis around management sense making of uncertainty and business performance to achieve the study's aim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The background information in the study refers to 'uncertainty' because scientists often encounter unexpected findings that don't align with the assumptions behind the hypothesis or theory being tested. Scientists have a tendency to formulate hypotheses in familiar terms, making it difficult to propose something new. Therefore, they may discount or overlook unexpected findings that challenge their assumptions.

When it comes to hypotheses, scientists generally focus on testing specific statements or predictions rather than directly addressing 'uncertainty' itself. However, in order to achieve the aim of the study, the colleague suggests that an additional hypothesis should be framed around the concept of management sense making of uncertainty and its impact on business performance.

User Jmertic
by
8.1k points