Final Answer:
In Barton's study, none of the participants had brain damage to the Fusiform Face Area (FFA). Consequently, the consequences of this absence of brain damage were not a direct focus or part of the study's findings.
Step-by-step explanation:
Barton's study primarily focused on individuals who had experienced damage to the Fusiform Face Area (FFA) and its effects on facial recognition abilities. The study did not involve participants who lacked brain damage to the FFA. Therefore, there were no specific consequences or findings related to individuals without FFA impairment within the scope of this particular study.
The study likely aimed to isolate and understand the impacts of FFA damage on facial recognition skills. By examining only individuals with FFA impairment, the researchers could draw conclusions about the significance of this brain area in processing facial information. However, due to the study's design, it did not investigate or provide insights into the performance or consequences in individuals who did not have damage to the FFA. Consequently, the findings should not be extrapolated to those without FFA impairment, as the study did not address their condition or outcomes in relation to facial recognition abilities.
In summary, Barton's study exclusively focused on individuals with FFA damage, precluding any analysis or conclusions regarding the consequences or performance of those without such brain damage. Therefore, no direct consequences were reported within the study for individuals lacking damage to the Fusiform Face Area.