Final answer:
Barton et al. (2002) methodology is noted for its robustness in incorporating uncertainty, ensuring consistent and reliable findings across various criteria.
Step-by-step explanation:
One methodological strength of Barton et al. (2002) could be the robustness of their analyses in the incorporation of uncertainty. This is drawn from a similar context where analyses have been shown to be broadly equivalent between criteria, as per Brooke et al. (2008), suggesting that the methodologies employed are capable of yielding consistent results across different evaluation frameworks. Additionally, the use of methodologies that are resilient to the effects of uncertainty, as indicated by Akçakaya et al. (2000), reinforces the reliability of Barton et al.'s research findings.