Final answer:
The main actors in Robert Dibie's 2009 case 'Ethical Dilemma in Local Government' include local government officials, stakeholders, and possibly state government figures, all facing challenges involving ethical decision-making and balancing various responsibilities and powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case Ethical Dilemma in Local Government, prepared by Robert Dibie in 2009, likely involves a set of main actors that includes local government officials such as mayors and city council members, stakeholders within the community such as local business owners and residents, and possibly other governmental figures like governors or state lawmakers. These actors have various interests ranging from economic development, public safety, and community welfare, to upholding the principles of democracy and fairness. Their responsibilities in the city encompass making decisions that reflect the will of their constituents while adhering to legal and ethical standards. These decisions base themselves on authority granted by state constitutions and laws, and are influenced by the cultural and policy differences that exist between different states.
Actors in local government must balance their actions with expectations from the national government, which sometimes leads to tensions over policy matters. Mayors and governors have unique powers, such as vetoing legislation or overseeing local law enforcement and emergency services. This case presents a democratic dilemma, as individuals and groups attempt to define and pursue the greater public good, amidst varying degrees of public participation and awareness of local political issues.
Questions raised in this scenario may include who determines the greater public good, the rights of the government versus the people, what constitutes a fair price, and how community responsibilities are addressed. These issues highlight the ethical considerations that leaders and citizens face in democratic governance and public policy development.