Final answer:
A child assuming that all eggs break based on the observation that a chicken egg and a robin's egg can break is engaging in inductive reasoning, where specific instances lead to broad generalizations, which may not be universally true.
Step-by-step explanation:
A child understanding that a chicken egg breaks, a robin's egg breaks, and then assuming all eggs break, is an example of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific instances or observations. Through this type of reasoning, individuals develop broader conclusions, which may not always be accurate. By observing that both chicken and robin eggs break, the child is using their past experiences to infer a general rule about all eggs.
Inductive reasoning is widely used in everyday life and scientific processes. It constitutes the basis for formulating theories which can later be tested using deductive reasoning. However, an important aspect to note is that conclusions drawn from inductive reasoning are not guaranteed to be true, as they are based on limited observations and may be subject to exceptions.