Final answer:
The court likely considered factors such as control, relationships, and statements to determine the Local Fraternity's duty. Agreement with the court's decision depends on the circumstances. Wabash College may have had no liability because they didn't assume control.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Factors Used by the Court
In order to determine that the Local Fraternity may have assumed a duty here, the court likely considered several factors. These factors may include:
The level of control exercised by the Local Fraternity over the activities at the event or location in question.
The relationship between the Local Fraternity and the individuals involved in the incident.
Any explicit or implicit statements or actions by the Local Fraternity that could create a reasonable expectation of safety or duty of care.
Agreement with the Court's Decision
Whether or not one agrees with the court's decision depends on the specific circumstances of the case. However, if the court found sufficient evidence to suggest that the Local Fraternity assumed a duty, it is likely that they considered relevant factors and legal principles before reaching that conclusion.
Wabash College's Lack of Liability
The court may have found that Wabash College had no liability for this incident because they did not assume or exercise control over the event or location in question. In legal terms, they may not have had a duty of care towards the individuals involved, and as a result, they cannot be held liable for any damages or injuries.