Final answer:
The employer may assert reasons such as qualifications, experience, or fit for not hiring the plaintiffs. The absence of a formal policy may weaken their argument. The law should promote awareness, encourage diversity, and foster inclusive practices in the entertainment industry.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this situation, the employer may assert that they did not hire the plaintiffs due to factors other than race, such as qualifications, experience, or fit for the specific role. The burden is on the employer to provide a legitimate reason for their hiring decision. However, the absence of a formal policy requiring lead roles to be white or setting different auditioning requirements for different races may weaken their argument.
Whether the law should require television producers to hire persons of color for lead roles in reality television shows is a complex question. While promoting diversity and equal opportunities for underrepresented groups is important, imposing mandatory requirements may infringe on the creative freedom and casting decisions of producers. Instead, promoting awareness, encouraging diversity in casting, and fostering inclusive practices in the entertainment industry can help address the issue.