Question

Idris is a college student attending a college in Maine. He is concerned about misinformation circulating online about the Covid-19 vaccines. To attempt to counteract this perceived misinformation, Idris distributes informative pamphlets on campus. While distributing his pamphlets, a local police officer tells him he must stop. When Idris refuses, he is arrested. This case will be heard in a

A. Maine state court because Idris is a college student.

B. State court because a local police officer arrested Idris.

C. Federal court because Idris's First Amendment rights were potentially violated.

D. Federal court because the pandemic is a federal issue.

Answer 1

Idris's case would be heard in a state court due to the local nature of his arrest by a police officer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The case involving Idris, a college student in Maine, who is arrested for distributing COVID-19 vaccine pamphlets, hinging on a potential First Amendment violation, would most likely be heard in a state court due to the local nature of the arrest. While the First Amendment issue could potentially raise federal questions, initial arrests by local law enforcement typically begin in the state legal system. Furthermore, the factual scenario presented does not inherently invoke federal jurisdiction merely because the pandemic is a federal issue or Idris's perceived First Amendment rights were involved.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question would be B. State court because a local police officer arrested Idris. Cases involving local police actions and arrests typically fall under the jurisdiction of state courts unless there is a federal question that necessitates the involvement of a federal court.