Oakley addresses claims of renewable energy's unreliability and high costs by citing technological advancements and decreasing prices. This refutation strengthens her argument, emphasizing long-term benefits and environmental considerations for widespread adoption.
Let's assume you're discussing an essay by Jane Oakley about the benefits of renewable energy: In Oakley's essay, two counterarguments may be that renewable energy sources are unreliable and expensive. She effectively refutes the unreliability claim by presenting studies showcasing advancements in technology, improved storage solutions, and successful renewable energy implementation globally. Concerning cost, Oakley addresses it by citing decreasing prices of renewable technologies over time and emphasizing long-term savings and environmental benefits.
Her refutation serves to strengthen her argument by demonstrating that technological progress addresses reliability concerns and that initial costs are outweighed by long-term gains. Oakley qualifies her stance by acknowledging challenges but posits that ongoing advancements and the broader benefits support a compelling case for widespread adoption of renewable energy.