Final answer:
The school district may be liable for the intentional tort committed by its employee, the custodian who hit the child who wrote graffiti on the wall. Whether the school district will be held liable will depend on several factors, including the scope of the employee's actions and the presence of preventative policies. Individual cases can vary based on specific circumstances and jurisdiction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The school district may be liable for the intentional tort committed by its employee, the custodian who hit the child who wrote graffiti on the wall. When an employee acts within the scope of their employment, the employer can be held responsible for their actions under the legal doctrine of vicarious liability. This means that the school district could be held accountable for the actions of its custodian.
However, whether the school district will be held liable will depend on several factors, including whether the custodian's actions were within the scope of their employment and whether the school district had policies in place to prevent such incidents.
It is important to note that this is a general legal analysis and individual cases can vary based on specific circumstances and jurisdiction.