170k views
1 vote
When you evaluate how well secondary research can be revised to address your specific business problem, you are considering its

- reliability.
- relevance.
- adaptability.
- expertise.
- biases.

User Kavare
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

When evaluating the potential of secondary research to be revised for a specific business problem, the aspect being considered is its relevance. Evaluating sources involves summarizing their central ideas, assessing their authority, reliability, biases, and reflecting on their impact on the research. Therefore correct option is B

Step-by-step explanation:

When you evaluate the secondary research for its potential to be revised to address your specific business problem, you are considering its relevance. Relevance is crucial as it determines whether the secondary research directly addresses the questions you are trying to answer with your project.

Evaluating sources involves a few important steps:

  • Summarize the central idea or scope of the source, especially in relation to your research project, to check for relevance.
  • Evaluate the source for authority, author's perspective, reliability, validity, and biases.
  • Reflect on how the source affects your research and thinking, which will help in the critical evaluation of the material.

As part of the process, you will also assess the timeliness of research, the relevance to the subject, directing, and quality of writing. This critical evaluation ensures that the evidence and information you include in your analysis are robust and credible, thus supporting a sound argument or business solution.

User R T
by
8.2k points