24.1k views
1 vote
All of the following statements about between-class ability grouping are true except one. which statement is false? group of answer choices

O teachers of low classes tend to be less enthused, have lower expectations, and focus on boring routine and memorization.
O placements into low classes are usually decided using group-administered iq test scores.
O students are assigned to whole classes (above average, average, below average) based on measured achievements.
O between-class ability grouping improves learning, including honors classes.

User Philngo
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The statement (option 4) that between-class ability grouping improves learning is false; this practice can perpetuate inequalities and is not proven to improve learning uniformly.

Step-by-step explanation:

  • The false statement about between-class ability grouping is that between-class ability grouping improves learning, including honors classes. Studies have shown that this form of grouping can actually perpetuate inequalities and does not necessarily lead to improved learning outcomes.
  • Teachers of lower-tracked classes may have lower expectations and provide less engaging material, while placements into such classes often rely on IQ test scores that may be culturally biased.
  • Additionally, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may face challenges that impede their academic performance and are not accounted for in these groupings.
User Schooner
by
7.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.