Final answer:
Among the options provided, 'value-based knowledge' is the one that does not fit the definition of explicit knowledge because it involves tacit components and personal beliefs, which are not easily codified or systematically shared.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question being discussed involves identifying an example of explicit knowledge that does not fit within its established definition. Explicit knowledge refers to information that can be easily articulated, recorded, and shared. It includes things like manuals and product specifications, knowledge disseminated publicly, and practice models or theories.
These forms of knowledge can be easily communicated and tend to be well-structured. On the other hand, value-based knowledge often involves tacit components which cannot be fully codified or may be based on personal beliefs or values that are intrinsic and subjective in nature. Therefore, among the options provided, the example of explicit knowledge that does not fit the definition is value-based knowledge.
Explicit knowledge is often contrasted with tacit knowledge, which is more experiential, intuitive, and harder to codify. For example, knowing how to ride a bike (procedural knowledge) is different from knowing the mechanics of a bike listed in a manual (explicit knowledge). Value-based knowledge might include personal convictions or cultural values, which are not always easily shared or described in a systematic manner like manuals or public knowledge.
The correct option that is not an example of explicit knowledge is value-based knowledge.