Final answer:
Economic nationalists generally agree with IR Realists, focusing on state power and security, akin to neorealists who prioritize national interests while recognizing international cooperation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Economic nationalists generally agree with IR Realists the most, aligning with the view of states prioritizing their security and power. Realism in international relations prompts states to enact policies to maintain their security, often by increasing their power. Economic nationalists focus on developing national industries and protecting workers to benefit their citizens, paralleling realists' focus on state security and power.
In contrast, liberalism sees states as part of a cooperative international system, whereas constructivism emphasizes evolving international norms. Critical theorists challenge established views by advocating for changes in the global system to address imbalances and inequalities. However, the approaches advocated by economic nationalists are closest to those of realists, particularly neorealists, who while recognizing the importance of international institutions like NATO, still emphasize the state's self-interest rooted in system structure.