Final answer:
Manufacturers can be held liable under strict liability for harm caused by defective products, such as vehicles with known brake defects. Strict liability does not necessitate proving negligence. Furthermore, governments may impose higher safety standards on imported goods to ensure public health and safety.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of product liability, particularly in cases where goods are found to be defective and cause injury or damage, the concept of strict liability is often applied to manufacturers. The basis for strict liability is that a manufacturer of a product has a responsibility to ensure that their product is free from defects that could cause harm to consumers. For example, if an automobile manufacturer releases a vehicle with a known defect in the brake system that could (and does) lead to accidents, injuries, or even deaths, the manufacturer could be held liable under the principles of strict liability, especially given prior knowledge of the defect.
This kind of liability does not require the injured party to prove negligence on the part of the manufacturer. However, questions do arise when it comes to the role of the government in establishing safety standards and ensuring fail-safe operation and maintenance of medical equipment and protocols. The government is often seen as a regulator that may impose higher safety standards on both domestic and imported goods, possibly even stricter than those existing in the goods' country of origin, to protect public health and safety.