Final answer:
The conflict approach in sociology critiques how the healthcare system reflects and deepens societal inequalities, highlighting the commodification of health and the power disparities between different social groups. Although the approach points out the flaws of a profit-driven healthcare system, it may not fully appreciate the benefits of medical advances and the importance of medical expertise. Examining these theories offers insight into the intersection of health practices and societal values.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conflict approach is a theory in sociology that scrutinizes how the healthcare system is influenced by and perpetuates societal inequalities. The conflict perspective argues that in a capitalist society, health becomes a commodity, services are distributed based on one's economic and social status, and this leads to disparities in healthcare access. While the conflict theorists highlight the social inequities, they are also critiqued for not fully recognizing the benefits that come from an economically driven medical research field, such as medical advancements. Additionally, the conflict approach tends to question the power dynamics between the physician and patient, which can overlook the valuable expertise that medical professionals provide.
In contrast, symbolic interactionism explores how health and illness are socially constructed, focusing on what specific meanings people attribute to illness, leading to the medicalization or demedicalization of certain behaviors. Yet, the conflict perspective, which views society as inherently unstable, emphasizes that this medicalization process can further entrench the power of medical professionals and marginalize those with less social power.
These theories provide a framework for understanding how medical practices and societal values intersect and the implications of who gets to define and treat health issues. They encourage considering diverse perspectives to understand the complex nature of healthcare and societal norms.