Final answer:
The main idea behind using a nested group strategy, starting with global groups, then universal groups, and finally local groups, is to streamline the management of permissions and user access within a network.
Therefore, the correct answer is: option B. To expedite adding individual users to local groups
Step-by-step explanation:
Gene, a security administrator, is considering this approach for efficiently managing an increasing number of user accounts. By nesting groups in this way, you create a scalable and organized structure where permissions are easier to manage and apply.
This approach allows for centralized administration of users in large environments. Main benefits include reduced complexity when managing permissions and access control, as user accounts are organized into global groups based on their role or department, then into universal groups if their access levels span multiple geographic locations.
Finally, they are placed into local groups on the specific resources they need to access. This hierarchical grouping simplifies the process of adding or removing user access to resources because the changes can be made at the group level rather than on individual user accounts.
It's particularly useful in situations where user access needs to be updated regularly, or changes to departmental structure or roles occur frequently.