Final answer:
Eminent domain, as outlined by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, allows the government to take private property for public use with just compensation; thus, the statement in question is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
Taking private property for public use, commonly known as eminent domain, is not an example of a concurrent power; rather, it is a function of the government rooted in the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause.
The Takings Clause states that private property can be taken for public use, provided there is just compensation for the property owner.
This clause gives rise to the government's ability to expropriate private property for uses that benefit the public such as schools, roads, or even economic redevelopment projects, as seen in the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London.
In light of this, the statement that taking private property for public use is a concurrent power or authority would be false.