Final answer:
The passage exemplifies good scientific writing due to its clarity and coherence, use of technical language related to visual rhetoric, and clear structure that includes a compelling introduction, well-supported claims, and effective counterclaim refutations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The passage can be seen as a good example of scientific writing due to several key features. Firstly, it provides clarity and coherence with language that helps readers navigate from one section to the next, using linked concepts and transitions to maintain focus on the topic.
Moreover, the author demonstrates a skilled use of technical language associated with visual rhetoric—like line, light, and point of view—which contributes to an engaging and professional tone that is appealing to readers. The writing also excels in structuring arguments, beginning with an introduction designed to catch interest and leading to a clear thesis.
This is supported by body paragraphs with central points backed by fact-based, reliable evidence, complete with appropriate and thorough analysis. Lastly, the writing successfully integrates refutations of counterclaims and is structured to appeal to readers' logic and emotions, showcasing the writer's capability to address the rhetorical situation effectively.