Final answer:
The incorrect statement about muscle adaptation is that increased muscle fiber length (sarcomeres in series) increases the power production in a muscle, which is false because optimal power is associated with the optimal range of sarcomere length and cross-bridge formation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Muscle Adaptation Incorrect Statement
The incorrect statement regarding muscle adaptation is that "increased muscle fiber length (sarcomeres in series) increases the power production in a muscle." This statement is false because the power of a muscle is more so related to the number of cross-bridges that can be formed during muscle contraction rather than the length of muscle fibers. In fact, sarcomere length has an optimal range for power production, and if a muscle is stretched too much or not enough, it won't produce maximal force. An increased number of sarcomeres in series can increase the range of motion and speed of contraction, but it does not directly correlate to an increase in force or power of the muscle.
Other statements such as "neural adaptations can increase muscle strength significantly without an increase in PCSA," "chronic lengthening (stretching) can result in an increased sarcomere number," and "an adaptively shortened muscle may reduce the range of motion over which you can produce torque" are all accurate descriptions of muscle adaptation processes.