Final answer:
The violation of religious beliefs by euthanasia is evidenced by the sanctity of human life, the traditional healer role of physicians, and the slippery slope argument. The potential for abuse in legislation could arise from coercion, misuse by authorities for fiscal reasons, and lack of informed consent.
Step-by-step explanation:
You have asked for three pieces of evidence that support the notion that euthanasia violates religious beliefs and three arguments that suggest the legislation of euthanasia can be abused. To begin with, many religions, including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, uphold the sanctity of human life, viewing euthanasia as morally equivalent to murder and a violation of the divine prohibition against killing. The physician's role is traditionally to heal and do no harm, and euthanasia directly conflicts with this duty since it involves actively ending a life. Furthermore, the potential for a slippery slope exists if euthanasia were to become widely practiced, leading to less respect for life and possibly justifying other types of killing.
Concerning legislation abuse, active euthanasia involves a physician or another person actively participating in causing death, which could lead to situations of coercion or exploitation, especially among the vulnerable. Situations where relatives or even government institutions might make decisions for personal gain or to reduce healthcare costs could arise, which would constitute a grave misuse of euthanasia. Moreover, without stringent oversight and safeguards, there might be scenarios where individuals are euthanized without their explicit and informed consent, violating personal liberty and autonomy.