156k views
1 vote
Anderson considers the factory farming and industrial agriculture of his society as far superior to the hunting and foraging practiced in a different society. Anderson is:

User Konr
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Hunting and gathering societies have their own unique advantages and may be considered superior in certain contexts, but factory farming and industrial agriculture have allowed for increased food production and efficiency.

Step-by-step explanation:

Anderson's view is a matter of personal opinion and interpretation. However, from an anthropological perspective, it is important to consider that hunting and gathering societies have their own unique advantages and may be considered superior in certain contexts.

Hunting and gathering societies have been found to have stronger bones, lower blood pressure, and less heart disease compared to neighboring agricultural communities. They also tend to have more leisure time and a more varied and flexible diet.

On the other hand, factory farming and industrial agriculture have allowed for increased food production and efficiency, which has supported the growth of larger populations. These practices have also played a role in the development of modern societies and economies.

User Noelmcg
by
8.3k points