Final answer:
The Ottoman Empire was often more tolerant of their conquered subjects' customs and religions, inviting scholars and artists to Istanbul, while the Spanish Empire exploited native labor and attempted to replace native beliefs with Catholicism after their conquests in the Americas.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Ottoman Empire and the Spanish Empire had distinct approaches in dealing with their conquered peoples. The Ottomans were known for incorporating new territories and people into their empire as a means of acquiring wealth. They employed a system of tolerance towards non-Muslims, often allowing them to practice their own religions and customs, though with the notorious practice of levying the devshirme system, where Christian boys were taken and trained as soldiers or administrators. However, in the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, scholars and artists were invited to Istanbul, which fostered intellectual exchange and even contributed to the Renaissance.
In contrast, the Spanish, after their conquests in the Americas, imposed a more exploitative system upon native populations. They asserted their control over native labor and attempted to supersede native religious beliefs with Catholicism, which led to significant resistance from the indigenous peoples. The Spanish viewed their conquered subjects more as labor resources rather than as potential citizens of their empire.