Final answer:
The student's question pertains to using the divider-chooser method to fairly divide loot among individuals. This method and concept fall under mathematics and precisely within the study of game theory related to fair distribution. Each person is ensured a fair share, which may differ from an equal split depending on individual perceptions of fairness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question involves the concept of distributive justice in the context of dividing items fairly among individuals, which is a principle often associated with the study of mathematics, specifically in the area of game theory and fair division algorithms. The divider-chooser method is one approach where one person divides the items, and the other participants choose the portions they prefer, aiming to ensure each person gets a fair share. In this scenario, since person A has already divided the piles, person B and person C will take turns choosing from the piles to ensure that they each find the division fair based on their own assessments. It's important to consider the views of fairness and how, in smaller groups or interactions, fair division can be easier to achieve because individuals are more accountable to each other, as suggested by the given references.
In game theory, especially in situations like the Ultimatum Game, fairness is not always about equal splits but what is perceived as fair by the individuals involved. This perception can be influenced by various factors such as the total amount of prize or the ability to negotiate power dynamics. When applying this to the student's query, we would ideally ensure that each person feels they are receiving a fair deal in their own view, which may or may not equate to an exact 50-50 split.