53.3k views
2 votes
Let A be a non-empty subset of R, not necessarily closed. define g:R→R by g(x)=inf{∣x−a∣:a∈A}.

(a) Prove g is continuous,
(b) Assuming now A closed, prove g(x)=0 if and only if x∈A. Is this result true if A is not closed?

User Tom Sabel
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The function g(x) = inf is continuous. Assuming A is closed, g(x) = 0 if and only if x ∈ A. This is not true if A is not closed.

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that the function g(x) = infx-a is continuous, we can show that for any given ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that |x - c| < δ implies |g(x) - g(c)| < ε for any x, c ∈ R.

To prove (a), let's choose δ = ε. Then, for |x - c| < δ, we have:

|g(x) - g(c)| = |infx - a - inf: a∈A| ≤ |x - c| < ε.

To prove (b), assuming A is closed, we can show that g(x) = 0 if and only if x ∈ A.

First, let's prove that if x ∈ A, then g(x) = 0. Since x ∈ A, we can choose a sequence (a_n) in A such that a_n → x as n → ∞. Therefore, for any ε > 0, there exists N such that |x - a_n| < ε for n ≥ N. This implies that g(x) = inf = 0.

Now, let's prove that if g(x) = 0, then x ∈ A. Since g(x) = 0, there exists a sequence (a_n) in A such that |x - a_n| → 0 as n → ∞. This implies that a_n → x as n → ∞. Therefore, x ∈ A.

This result is not true if A is not closed, since there can be points in A's closure that are not in A.

User Jeremi Liwanag
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories