Question

During riots in various cities throughout the United States, many poor people, looted TV, and appliance stores for items they said they were denied by a corrupt society that segregated and oppressed them. Some of them said Such items were not really luxuries because most Americans had them. Consider the following into finding the moral dilemma:

Is there anything to the poor peoples arguments? Why or why not?

Answer 1

The poor people's arguments during the riots in the United States revolved around feeling denied access to basic necessities due to societal oppression. They believed that items like televisions and appliances were necessities and targeted stores that refused to hire black workers and mistreated black tenants. Frustration and anger were fueled by the lack of healthcare, job opportunities, and safe housing in their communities.

Step-by-step explanation:

The poor people's arguments during the riots in the United States were based on the belief that they were denied access to basic necessities by a corrupt and oppressive society. They argued that items like televisions and appliances were not luxuries because they were considered necessities by most Americans. The riots targeted stores that refused to hire black workers and landlords who mistreated black tenants. The frustration and anger of the poor were fueled by the lack of healthcare, job opportunities, and safe housing in their communities, which they felt the government and civil rights groups had failed to address.