42.0k views
3 votes
When a Type I error is less severe than a Type II error, we should choose a large significance level like 0.9. True or False

User Mnel
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The statement is false because choosing a large significance level increases the probability of making a Type I error, which is not desirable even when a Type I error is considered less severe than a Type II error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is false. In hypothesis testing, the significance level (denoted as α, alpha) represents the threshold for the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis. When we say that a Type I error is less severe than a Type II error, it does not mean that we should choose a large significance level like 0.9.

Instead, we typically choose a smaller significance level (e.g., 0.05) to reduce the likelihood of making a Type I error. However, the severity of Type I and Type II errors depends on the context of the research question, and we should adjust the significance level accordingly to balance the risks of both errors. A large significance level would increase the risk of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis, which is undesirable.

User Petebolduc
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.