Final answer:
The question discusses the application of statistical methods to determine the mean, standard deviation, and appropriate distribution model for a given proportion of customer calls to a helpline, and whether the improved instructions were effective by using a Z-test.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of this question falls under the category of Mathematics, more specifically, topics related to statistics and probability, which are often covered in high school curriculum.
a. To calculate the mean (μ_p) of the sampling distribution of proportion (p), we use the formula μ_p = P, where P is the population proportion. For the standard deviation (σ_p), we use the formula σ_p = sqrt(P(1 - P) / n). Given that P = 0.18 and n = 100, we have:
- Mean (μ_p) = 0.18
- Standard Deviation (σ_p) = sqrt(0.18 * 0.82 / 100) = 0.039
b. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution (0.039) measures the variability of sample proportions around the population proportion. It represents how much the proportion in a sample of size 100 is expected to differ from the population proportion of 0.18.
c. The use of normal distribution to model the sampling distribution of p is appropriate if the sample size is large enough and if np and n(1-p) are both greater than 5. Here, 100 * 0.18 = 18 and 100 * 0.82 = 82, which meets the criteria, so a normal distribution can be used.
d. To find the probability that at most 14% of the customers in the sample call the help line, we need to use the normal approximation of the binomial: Z = (p - P) / σ_p. For p = 0.14, Z = (0.14 - 0.18) / 0.039. We would then look up this Z-value in a standard normal table or use a calculator to find the corresponding probability.
e. If the sample shows that 14% of the customers called the help line, this is lower than the claimed 18%. Using the Z-value calculated in (d) and the normal distribution table or calculator, we can check if the result is statistically significant. If the probability of obtaining a sample proportion of 14% or less is low under the assumption that the true proportion is 18%, it provides evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the claim that the improved instructions reduced the percentage of calls for help.