Question

Rachel and Mitzie were both raised in families that loved fancy, expensive clothing. However, they both have low-wage jobs and are unable to afford expensive clothing. As adults, Rachel shoplifts in order to boost her wardrobe. Mitzie decided that clothes are no longer important to her, so she just wears a few simple outfits. According to anomie theory, Rachel shows _____________whereas Mitzie shows _____________.

Answer 1

Rachel's action is an example of 'innovation' as she turns to shoplifting to achieve the goal of wearing fancy clothing, while Mitzie represents 'ritualism' by dismissing the importance of clothing and wearing simple outfits instead, according to anomie theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to anomie theory, Rachel shows 'innovation' whereas Mitzie shows 'ritualism'. Anomie theory, most notably associated with sociologist Robert Merton, suggests that individuals in a society may adapt in various ways when there is a disjunction between societal goals and the means available to achieve them.

In this case, both women were raised to value expensive clothing but lack the financial means to purchase such items.

Rachel adopts innovation by attempting to achieve the culturally prescribed goal of possessing fancy clothing through illegitimate means—shoplifting. Mitzie, on the other hand, displays ritualism by abandoning the societal goal of having fancy clothing and instead adheres to her own set of rules by wearing simple outfits. These adaptations highlight how individuals navigate pressures and expectations from their social contexts.