The author of Passage 2 critiques the argument in Passage 1 as "undeveloped but encouraging."
How to explain
While acknowledging the urgency of addressing climate change, Passage 2 finds fault in the lack of depth regarding economic feasibility within Passage 1's proposals.
Passage 2 advocates for a more pragmatic, balanced approach that considers economic realities alongside environmental concerns.
It sees potential in the urgency highlighted by Passage 1 but contends that a more comprehensive consideration of practical implementation and economic factors is necessary to achieve effective climate change solutions.
Therefore, while finding promise in Passage 1's urgency, Passage 2 suggests it lacks the necessary depth in terms of practicality and economic viability.
Complete Question:
After reviewing both Passage 1 and Passage 2 on page 60, what judgment would the author of Passage 2 most likely offer regarding the argument presented in Passage 1?
Text:
(Excerpt from Passage 1)
"The approach to handling climate change must involve immediate global cooperation and a comprehensive restructuring of industries to mitigate its effects on the environment. Failure to do so will lead to irreversible damage to the planet's ecosystems."
(Excerpt from Passage 2)
"The author of Passage 1, in advocating for immediate global cooperation and industrial restructuring to combat climate change, lacks consideration of economic feasibility and practical implementation. While acknowledging the urgency, a more pragmatic and gradual approach, balancing environmental concerns with economic realities, seems paramount."