Final answer:
Cole is drafting a legal pleading for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida concerning the denial of a writ of habeas corpus, potentially involving Sixth Amendment concerns regarding the right to counsel.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cole, representing himself as his own counsel, is involved in the legal process of drafting a legal pleading. This pleading is a formal document that might be a petition or a motion submitted to a court. In this scenario, Cole is petitioning for a Writ of Certiorari, which is a request for a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Specifically, Cole is asking the Supreme Court of the State of Florida to examine the lower court's denial of a writ of habeas corpus, which is a court order demanding that an individual in custody be brought before the court to ascertain the legality of their detention.
The reference to the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment, as seen in the case of Glasser v. United States, suggests that there may be underlying constitutional issues related to Cole's right to counsel or representation in his case. It appears that Cole may feel a profound injustice has occurred, as mentioned in the personal plea which reflects a situation of alleged wrongful conviction.
The texts by Coyle and Ferguson likely offer insight into contemporary issues regarding the legal system, including the workings of the Supreme Court and the role of jury duty, which could provide context or supporting information to Cole's legal challenge.