Final answer:
The Rogerian argument is one that focuses on understanding the other side with an aim to reach common ground rather than to win. It requires recognizing and addressing counterclaims, supporting arguments with facts, inferences, and informed opinions, and adjusting the presentation to the audience’s needs.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding Argumentation
The argument that focuses on understanding the other side is known as a Rogerian argument. The core of this argument style is to acknowledge and consider opposing viewpoints without overt confrontation, which contrasts with the Toulmin method that more traditionally structures arguments or the adversarial nature of debates. In Rogerian arguments, the goal is not solely winning but rather reaching a mutually beneficial understanding or compromise. This is an example of critical thinking, where the ability to identify and solve problems is paramount, requiring a careful analysis and evaluation of all evidence. It's important to present an argument by supporting the viewpoint with reasoning and evidence that may include facts, quotes, paraphrases, and summaries while providing correct citations.
Furthermore, when forming an argument, it is essential to distinguish between facts, inferences, and informed opinions. Facts represent verifiable information, while inferences are logical deductions made from these facts. An informed opinion, while valuable, is still a belief and should be supported by factual evidence when used in an argumentative context. Adjusting format, tone, language, and conventions to the specific audience is also critical in presenting a strong argument.
The process of argumentation is not just about making assertions but also understanding and responding to counterclaims, representing those who may dissent from your own views. By engaging with counterclaims, one can hone their argument, making it more robust and resilient. The ultimate purpose of a well-crafted argument is to persuade the reader through the use of logic and reason, though always grounded in factual evidence.