Final answer:
Mala prohibita crimes do involve intent as the individual must knowingly commit the act, even if the action isn't inherently wrong. The intent is fulfilled by the knowledge of the act being prohibited.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mala prohibita crimes do typically involve intent, but not necessarily in the same way as mala in se crimes which are inherently wrong. Mala prohibita offenses are prohibited by law but are not necessarily wrong in themselves. These laws are in place to regulate behavior and maintain order even though the act itself may not be intrinsically evil or immoral. Examples of mala prohibita crimes include jaywalking, parking violations, and licensing violations which do not inherently harm but are prohibited to ensure societal order and safety.
Intent, in the case of mala prohibita, means the individual commiting the act does so knowingly, but it does not require the same sort of malice or intent to do harm that mala in se crimes entail. Simple awareness of the action being prohibited can fulfill the intent requirement for many mala prohibita crimes. For instance, ignorance of a law such as traffic regulations does not absolve the violator from the responsibility of the act. Thus, while the aspect of intent is different from more serious crimes, it still plays a role in prosecuting and convicting mala prohibita offenses.