Final answer:
The cartoonist likely views the Espionage and Sedition Acts as laws that took away basic liberties, as they criminalized criticism and opposition during World War I, leading to numerous prosecutions and limiting free speech, which infringed upon First Amendment rights.option D is correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The cartoonist's opinion about the Espionage and Sedition Acts is best expressed by the statement that the laws took away basic liberties (Option D). The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were designed to suppress criticism and opposition to World War I. Not only did they limit what could be mailed and banned anti-war newspapers and pamphlets, but they also made criticizing the federal government, the Constitution, military uniforms, and the flag a criminal offense.
Numerous individuals, including American citizens and labor leaders like Eugene V. Debs, were prosecuted and imprisoned, and some immigrants faced deportation.The Supreme Court upheld these acts in Schenck v. United States, applying the 'clear and present danger' test that allowed the government to limit free speech during times of war.
However, this justification encroached upon the protections promised by the First Amendment, and many saw these acts as a violation of these fundamental rights. By 1921, the Espionage and Sedition Acts were mostly repealed, reflecting the controversial nature and the perceived infringement on civil liberties they represented.