Final answer:
The powers of the president and the king of England prior to the Magna Carta had both similarities and differences. The president had powers such as executive power, commander in chief, foreign relations, pardoning power, and implied powers. On the other hand, the king of England had ultimate power, church authority, taxation, judiciary power, and the appointment of officials.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing the powers of the president to the powers of a king of England prior to the Magna Carta, there are several similarities and differences. Here are five powers for each category:
Powers of the President:
- Executive Power: The president has the authority to make and enforce laws.
- Commander in Chief: The president is the head of the military and has the power to declare war.
- Foreign Relations: The president handles diplomacy and represents the country in international affairs.
- Pardoning Power: The president can pardon individuals convicted of crimes.
- Implied Powers: The president may exercise powers that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
Powers of a King of England:
- Ultimate Power: The king had absolute control over the country and its subjects.
- Church Authority: The king had the power to appoint bishops and control religious matters.
- Taxation: The king could impose taxes on the people.
- Judiciary: The king had the final say in legal matters and could issue judgments.
- Appointment of Officials: The king had the power to appoint government officials.