29.3k views
7 votes
6 Item 6 For a specific species of fish in a pond, a wildlife biologist wants to build a regression equation to predict the weight of a fish based on its length. The biologist collects a random sample of this species of fish and finds that the lengths vary from 0.75 to 1.35 inches. The biologist uses the data from the sample to create a single linear regression model. Would it be appropriate to use this model to predict the weight of a fish of this species that is 3 inches long

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

Yes, because the regression equation is based on the random sample.

Explanation:

A simple linear regression model that describes the relationship between X and Y takes the form

Yi= ∝ + βXi + εi or

Y i= U(y.x) + εi

where εi's are the random errors. The random errors εi's are assumed to be independent of Xi and normally distributed with E(εi)= 0 and Var (εi)= σ²(y.x) , a constant for all Xi. These assumptions imply that Yi also have a common variance σ²(y.x) , as the only random element in the is εi.

The estimated regression line Y= a+ bX is also the predictor of Yi= ∝ + βXi+ εi

. That is Y^ can also be used to predict an individual value Y0 of Yi rather than a mean value, corresponding to the given X0. To draw the inferences about Y0 we need to know it mean and variance.

User Kafran
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.