Final answer:
The resolution of 'The Forty Thieves' is morally ambiguous, as it may involve unethical actions by the main characters and relies on deceit. This resolution prompts the audience to question the nature of good and evil and whether ends justify means which is not always satisfying from a moral standpoint.
Step-by-step explanation:
The resolution of the story 'The Forty Thieves' can be seen as morally ambiguous due to the characters' decisions and actions. Considering the tales where divine beings partake in dubious behaviors, playwrights pushed audiences to contemplate the morality within the narratives. Similarly, the resolution of 'The Forty Thieves' may not align with strict ethical standards because it involves deceit and rewards the cunning over the virtuous.
Philosophical inquiry seeks to understand the nature of good and evil, questioning whether actions serving the greater good can justify moral wrongs. The notion that moral evil may contribute to the 'good' and is part of a grand scheme - one that is beyond human understanding and only known to a deity - can be unsatisfactory, as it evades reason and places the issue in the realm of mystery.
In the story's resolution, lessons are learned and the narrator reflects on the outcome. Yet, some actions by the main character are unethical, which could make the resolution of the story unacceptable from a moral standpoint. The main character's actions to outwit the thieves involve deceit and manipulation, which, while leading to a satisfying conclusion in the context of the story, raise moral and ethical concerns.