Final answer:
The per capita ecological footprint is 2.6 global hectares per person, while the biocapacity is 1.8 global hectares per person. This indicates that the ecological demands of the human population exceed the Earth's biocapacity. If the population continues to grow, the Earth may be unable to sustain it.
Step-by-step explanation:
The per capita ecological footprint measures the amount of resources and land needed to support each individual. In this case, the per capita ecological footprint is 2.6 global hectares per person. This means that each person on average requires 2.6 hectares of land to sustain their lifestyle and consumption patterns.
The biocapacity, on the other hand, represents the Earth's ability to regenerate and provide resources. With a biocapacity of 1.8 global hectares per person, it signifies that the Earth can only sustainably provide 1.8 hectares of resources per person.
Based on these numbers, we can conclude that the ecological demands of the human population exceed the biocapacity of the Earth. If the human population continues to increase, the ecological footprint would surpass the Earth's ability to support it, potentially resulting in a crash of the population.