Final answer:
The founders prioritized executive/legislative independence to distribute power equitably and protect against authoritarian rule, informed by their experiences under British governance and the desire for a balanced mixed government with separation of powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Why Were the Founders Obsessed with Executive/Legislative Independence?
The founders' obsession with executive/legislative independence stems from their experiences under British rule, where the colonial charters were undermined by the British Parliament, prompting concerns for liberty and a push towards independence. The Americans desired to end monarchy while preserving a mixed government to prevent any single branch from dominating the government. This quest for balance is evident in revolutionary leaders' debates over the governance structure: some proposals were rejected for appearing too aristocratic, while others aimed to safeguard republican values by empowering the legislature and limiting the executive branch.
An important aspect of this was the desire to establish a separation of powers, ensuring that legislative, judicial, and executive branches would remain independent and wield balanced influence. This separation was considered essential for liberty and the prevention of tyranny.
Overall, through various state constitutions and ultimately, the U.S. Constitution, the founders institutionalized checks and balances, separation of powers, and a bicameral legislature, reflecting a clear intent to distribute power equitably and protect against the rise of authoritarian rule. The result was a novel approach to governance, contrasting sharply with the British monarchical system they had abandoned.