Final answer:
English-only laws are more aligned with modern forms of institutional racism, claiming that they are an example of biological racism false. Scientific racism entails the belief in inherent racial superiority and was popular until the early 20th century. The colonizationist scheme was not widely favored by all Black abolitionists.
Step-by-step explanation:
“English-only” laws are often viewed as exclusionary policies that may marginalize non-English speakers and can be indicative of modern forms of exclusionary or institutional racism rather than old or biological racism. Biological racism, or scientific racism, is an ideology that was popular until the early 20th century which claimed that race is a valid biological concept and that human behavior is determined in part by race. It includes the belief in racial hierarchies and the idea that some races are inherently superior to others.
On the other hand, modern forms of racism, such as those implicated by “English-only” laws, are more insidious and often function systematically through policies and social practices. For example, racial steering in real estate and the disproportionate placement of minority students in lower-track classes in schools can perpetuate structural racism and implicit biases. Therefore, the assertion that “English-only” laws exemplify old or biological racism is false; these laws are more aligned with modern, institutional, or structural forms of racism.