Final answer:
Consumption patterns are generally true indicators of class location, as class traits reflect economic status and cultural exposure, but they can also be based on stereotypes with blurred lines in reality. The statements about the Cult of Domesticity and the temperance movement are true and reflect their respective social impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consumption patterns can, to some extent, indicate a person's class location, so the statement is true. This is because class traits, including behaviors, customs, and norms, often reflect a person's economic capacity and cultural exposure. For instance, the upper class is often associated with expensive tastes and luxury goods, while the middle and lower classes might be associated with more affordable, mass-market items. However, it is important to acknowledge that these are stereotypes, and in reality, class distinctions have blurred. A wealthy individual could enjoy simple pleasures, and someone with less income might have refined tastes or unexpectedly own high-end items.
The notion of separate spheres and the Cult of Domesticity in 19th-century America indeed served as a way for the middle class to distinguish and elevate themselves above the working class, which can be considered as true. Similarly, social movements such as the temperance movement arose from new social conditions like urbanization and immigration, which is also true. Lastly, the market revolution significantly impacted social and economic states in the United States, making that statement true as well.