Final answer:
The question likely confuses Robert E. Lee, the historical figure, with a general inquiry about abstaining from reading literature. Various thinkers like DiYanni, Orwell, and Sydney offer insights into why individuals might not engage with novels or plays, emphasizing personal biases, perceived literary value, and the transformative potential of literary critique.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question, "Why does Robert E. Lee not read novels or plays?" suggests a curiosity about the personal habits or principles of a historical figure regarding their engagement with literature.
However, it seems that there might be a confusion of names or a lack of context regarding who Robert E. Lee is. Robert E. Lee was a Confederate general during the American Civil War, and the question might intend to address why someone would abstain from reading novels or plays in general, rather than pertaining specifically to Lee's personal habits.
When it comes to the broader interpretation of this question, the motivation behind why someone may choose not to read novels or plays can draw from various reasons. DiYanni's quote mentions that readers often approach literature with blurred and divided minds. George Orwell's essay ponders on the value of what is considered 'bad' literature and suggests a kind of snobbery in dismissing popular writings.
Sir Philip Sydney defended the value of poetry against detractors in the early modern period, and more recently, Graff encountered a transformative experience by delving into literary criticism. All of these references highlight the varied and personal nature of engagement with literature and the complexities of taste, value, and personal relevance.