Final answer:
The statement about discovery and intention statements is true, as they are meant to lead to behavioral changes to be effective. In science, experiments and data are part of an ongoing process of hypothesis testing and theory refinement, and all types of data are useful. Moreover, there are various valid scientific methods beyond experimentation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that discovery and intention statements can be useless if they don't lead to changes in behavior is generally true. These statements are meant to guide a person's decision-making processes and actions. If after acknowledging a discovery or setting an intention, an individual's behavior remains unchanged, the purpose of making such statements is not fulfilled. Behavioral changes are often essential for actual progress or improvement.
Similarly, in the realm of scientific experiments, a hypothesis must lead to the formation of experiments and the collection of data. This process is used for testing the validity of the hypothesis. Experimental data needs to then feed back into the scientific knowledge base, affecting future hypotheses, theories, and applications. Otherwise, the experimental process would be deemed unproductive.
Moreover, the fact that data that does not support a hypothesis is considered not useful is false. Such data is actually critical, as it helps refine or refute a hypothesis or theory. Alternatives to experimentation, like observational studies or correlational research, are also valid scientific methods. Experimentation is not the only valid type of scientific investigation.