Final answer:
Lauren's behavior, which deviates from cultural norms without causing distress or impairment, would not be deemed abnormal. Sociological perspectives would examine the contextual relevance of her behavior rather than labeling it as strictly abnormal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lauren displays behavior that deviates from culturally acceptable norms, but since it doesn't cause her subjective distress or psychological impairment, her behavior would not be considered abnormal according to most contemporary psychological and sociological texts. This is because while deviation from cultural norms can indicate abnormality, the lack of subjective distress or functional impairment often means the behavior doesn't meet the full criteria for abnormality as outlined in many models of mental health. Indeed, what is considered deviant is often context-dependent, and as norms vary across cultures and over time, so too do notions of what constitutes abnormal behavior.
For example, sociological perspectives might view Lauren's behavior as simply nonconformity rather than dysfunction. A functionalist would be interested in how her behavior impacts society's stability, a conflict theorist might examine her actions in terms of power dynamics, and a symbolic interactionist could look at how her behaviors challenge the symbols and meanings within her culture. It's noteworthy that not all deviations are seen as negative; they can also reflect personal choice and cultural diversity.