82.1k views
5 votes
In the middle ages, people accused of being witches were often tested by being dunked in a river or pond. If they floated to the surface, they were condemned as witches. If they sank and drowned, they were posthumously acquitted. This test obviously lacks __________.

a. Reliability
b. Validity
c. Accuracy
d. Consistency

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The tests for witchcraft in the Middle Ages, such as the dunking test, lacked validity because they had no scientific or logical foundation to determine the guilt or innocence in witchcraft, leading to unfounded accusations and wrongful executions, as exemplified by the Salem Witch Trials.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Middle Ages, tests for witchcraft, such as dunking accused individuals to see if they would float, lacked validity. Such methods assumed the guilty of witchcraft would supernaturally float, while the innocent would sink.

However, these tests had no scientific or logical basis to prove someone's involvement in witchcraft. The tragic result of such tests often led to innocent people being falsely accused and condemned. The most notorious cases of this occurred during the Salem Witch Trials, where societal fear and hysteria fueled unfounded accusations and led to the execution of 19 individuals. Women were predominantly the targets, seen as more susceptible to the devil, while non-conformity was penalized in the rigid Puritan society.

The Salem trials lacked a rational-legal framework and heavily relied on spectral evidence and public panic, which further underscores the invalidity of the so-called witch detection methods of the period.

User Juan Delgado
by
8.1k points